<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: One Controversial, Uncertain, Imperfect Chance: Is It Worth It?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.anthonyworlando.com/2009/06/30/one-controversial-uncertain-imperfect-chance-is-it-worth-it/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.anthonyworlando.com/2009/06/30/one-controversial-uncertain-imperfect-chance-is-it-worth-it/</link>
	<description>A blog by Anthony W. Orlando and friends</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 17:57:33 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Trading Eights &#187; Getting More for Less: A Solution for American Health Care</title>
		<link>http://www.anthonyworlando.com/2009/06/30/one-controversial-uncertain-imperfect-chance-is-it-worth-it/comment-page-1/#comment-151</link>
		<dc:creator>Trading Eights &#187; Getting More for Less: A Solution for American Health Care</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Aug 2009 17:03:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aworlando.wordpress.com/?p=34#comment-151</guid>
		<description>[...] sides were amenable to fact-based reason. Alas, it should come as no surprise to any student of public choice economics that such progress is not to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] sides were amenable to fact-based reason. Alas, it should come as no surprise to any student of public choice economics that such progress is not to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trading Eights &#187; Texting While Driving, Giant Jellyfish, and Tanning Beds&#8230;It&#8217;s a Dangerous World Out There!</title>
		<link>http://www.anthonyworlando.com/2009/06/30/one-controversial-uncertain-imperfect-chance-is-it-worth-it/comment-page-1/#comment-26</link>
		<dc:creator>Trading Eights &#187; Texting While Driving, Giant Jellyfish, and Tanning Beds&#8230;It&#8217;s a Dangerous World Out There!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 02:14:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aworlando.wordpress.com/?p=34#comment-26</guid>
		<description>[...] by Analysis &#8212; Bruce Vladeck &#8211; Very good history to keep in mind. This also goes back to my point about Waxman-Markey that the intangible (and secondary and tertiary) benefits are usually higher than expected because [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] by Analysis &#8212; Bruce Vladeck &#8211; Very good history to keep in mind. This also goes back to my point about Waxman-Markey that the intangible (and secondary and tertiary) benefits are usually higher than expected because [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trading Eights &#187; What to Read on July 19, 2009</title>
		<link>http://www.anthonyworlando.com/2009/06/30/one-controversial-uncertain-imperfect-chance-is-it-worth-it/comment-page-1/#comment-13</link>
		<dc:creator>Trading Eights &#187; What to Read on July 19, 2009</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2009 14:20:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aworlando.wordpress.com/?p=34#comment-13</guid>
		<description>[...] &#8212; Greg Mankiw &#8211; Good questions. I don&#8217;t know if a veto is the smartest move; I pointed out, for example, that the cap-and-trade might be better than nothing, and &#8220;nothing&#8221; might [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &#8212; Greg Mankiw &#8211; Good questions. I don&#8217;t know if a veto is the smartest move; I pointed out, for example, that the cap-and-trade might be better than nothing, and &#8220;nothing&#8221; might [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trading Eights &#187; What to Read on July 7, 2009</title>
		<link>http://www.anthonyworlando.com/2009/06/30/one-controversial-uncertain-imperfect-chance-is-it-worth-it/comment-page-1/#comment-8</link>
		<dc:creator>Trading Eights &#187; What to Read on July 7, 2009</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 12:22:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aworlando.wordpress.com/?p=34#comment-8</guid>
		<description>[...] choice issues make them much less beneficial in practice.&#8221; (There are areas, as indicated in my post on Waxman-Markey, where government investments do have high ROIs, but in general Kling&#8217;s point &#8212; and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] choice issues make them much less beneficial in practice.&#8221; (There are areas, as indicated in my post on Waxman-Markey, where government investments do have high ROIs, but in general Kling&#8217;s point &#8212; and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
